Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, A beneficial., & Rumiati, R. I. (2021). This new sum away from identity and you will cleverness towards the intellectual competences into the high training. Frontiers when you look at the Psychology, a dozen, 2566.
Damian, Roentgen. I., Spengler, Meters., Sutu, A great., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). 16 happening 60-six: A beneficial longitudinal examination of character balance and alter round the 50 years. Diary from Personality and you may Social Psychology, 117(3), 674.
Daurio, A good. Meters., & Taylor, J. (2022). An investigation of your triarchic model of psychopathy and you will worry about-advertised Class B personality infection faculties. Identification Conditions: Idea, Look, and you can Procedures, 13(2), 153.
Furnham, A., & Monsen, J. (2009). Personality traits and cleverness anticipate informative university levels. Understanding and individual variations, 19(1), 28-33.
Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Forecasting academic and personal–emotional effects when you look at the emerging adulthood away from intelligence, character, and you will socioeconomic position. Log off Identification and you will Public Psychology.
Holland, A good. S., & Roisman, Grams. I. (2008). Huge Five character traits and you can relationships quality: Self-said, observational, and you can psychological proof. Journal away from Public and personal Relationships, 25(5), 811-829.
Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, Yards. (2006). The connection between intelligence and you will breakup. Log off Family unit members Factors, 27(12), 1723-1748.
Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology regarding People-B Identity Conditions regarding Four-Foundation Model Position. Chinese Mental health Log.
Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). School education and you will low-cognitive skills advancement. Oxford Monetary Documentation, 70(2), 538-562.
Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The fresh perception out of parents' and spouses' degree toward split up pricing in Norway. Group search, 10, 121-142.
Mathes, Age. W., Brennan, S. Yards., Haugen, P. Yards., & Grain, H. B. (1985). Studies from actual elegance given that a purpose of many years. The newest Record from Societal Psychology, 125(2), 157-168.
Spouse worth could possibly get decline (or perhaps not), although it does not be seemingly a boundary to help you dating creation
McGue, M., Anderson, Elizabeth. L., Willoughby, Age., Giannelis, A., Iacono, W. Grams., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Not by the g alone: The advantages of a college degree among individuals with low levels from standard intellectual ability. Cleverness, 92, 101642.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Carter, Yards. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Are social anyone far more gorgeous? A no-associate research out-of agreeableness, extraversion, and you may attractiveness. Record of Lookup in the Personality, 44(2), 293-296.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). The newest correspondence anywhere between university impoverishment and you can agreeableness from inside the anticipating instructional attainment. Character and you will Individual Differences, 127, 85-88.
Standard attributes off identification and you may affectivity given that predictors from fulfillment from inside the close matchmaking: Facts away from notice?and you may companion?recommendations
Tatarunaite, Elizabeth., Playle, Roentgen., Bonnet, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Face appeal: a good longitudinal study. Western Record off Orthodontics and you may Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.
Sarah Ton, Miriam Queen, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and Michael Westberry. Provided Social Play with Microdata Series, Current Populace Questionnaire: Type 10.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.
Scott, S. B., Rhoades, Grams. K., Stanley, S. M., Allen, Elizabeth. S., & ). Reasons for split up and you will thoughts regarding premarital intervention: Implications having improving relationship education. Couple and you will Friends Psychology: Browse and exercise, 2(2), 131.
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). Why do personality traits predict divorce case? Several paths owing to satisfaction. Journal regarding Identity and you may Public Mindset, 106(6), 978.
Vernon, P. Good., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A. (2008). A behavioral hereditary investigation of your Dark Triad together with Huge 5. Identification and you will private Differences, 44(2), 445-452.
Widiger, T. A good., Sellbom, Yards., Chmielewski, Yards., Clark, L. An excellent., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, Roentgen., ... & Wright, A great. Grams. (2019). Identification into the good hierarchical model of psychopathology. Logical Mental Science, 7(1), 77-ninety-five.
The present day CPS research do not inform you whether your threat of divorce or separation is ingredient. Affairs could mean mixed marriages features higher otherwise down risks than simply the entire dangers of a couple of someone. Yet not, earlier in the day search into breakup and you can knowledge demonstrates it’s (Lyngstad, 2004). The newest split up risk for two PhD proprietors is approximately 15%, consistent with the private chance of 7-8% having personal PhD proprietors.
Buss, D. M., Goetz https://kissbrides.com/fr/femmes-asiatiques/, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The fresh partner switching hypothesis. Character and you will Personal Variations, 104, 143-149.
